ISSN: 2692-4625
Annals of Antivirals and Antiretrovirals
Research Article       Open Access      Peer-Reviewed

Direct action antivirals are effective in the total eradication of HCV in renal transplants

Teresa Olea1*, Inmaculada Castillo2, Carlos Jiménez1, Javier Bartolomé2, María José Santana1, JA Quiroga2, Vicente Carreño2 and Rafael Selgas1

1Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ. RED in REN, Madrid, Spain
2Fundación para el Estudio de Hepatitis Virales y Fundación Investigaciones Biomédicas, Madrid, Spain
*Corresponding author: Teresa Olea, Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046- Madrid, Spain, Tel: +34 658158233; E-mail:
Received: 30 May, 2019 | Accepted: 19 July, 2019 | Published: 22 July, 2019
Keywords: Kidney transplantation; Occult hepatitis C virus; Antivirals

Cite this as

Olea T, Castillo I, Jiménez C, Bartolomé J, Santana MJ, et al. (2018) Direct action antivirals are effective in the total eradication of HCV in renal transplants. Ann Antivir Antiretrovir 3(1): 001-005. DOI: 10.17352/aaa.000005

Introduction: The main objective of our study was to analyze the effectiveness of antiviral treatment (conventional or with direct-acting antivirals (DAA)) for total eradication of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) in kidney transplant (KT) recipients. DAA are known drugs that are approved by FDA for clinical and pre-clinical investigations. The efficacy was analyzed by testing for the presence of HCV- ribonucleic acid (RNA) in the pellets obtained after ultracentrifugation of follow-up plasma samples and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from patients with HCV infection who had achieved a sustained virological response (SVR). The safety, and the renal and hepatic repercussions of the antiviral treatment were also evaluated.

Patients and methods: We evaluated 18 adults receiving KT, whose HCV infection had been treated with antiviral therapy. HCV RNA was tested by real-time RT-PCR in PBMC and in 2 ml of plasma after ultracentrifugation.

Results: The predominant HCV genotype was 1b (78.6%), followed by 3a (14.3%) and 2a-2c in 1 patient (7.1%). Of the 18 patients, 13 received treatment post-KT with DAA (8 as first treatment and 5 as retreatment due to relapse). The other 5 patients were responders to INF, INF-RBV and one to DAA pre-KT.

In none of the 14 recipients of KT treated with DAA the presence of HCV RNA was detected neither in PBMC nor in plasma after ultracentrifugation. Viral RNA was also undetectable in the PBMC of the 4 patients with SVR after treatment with IFN (monotherapy or with RBV). However, one of them was positive to HCV RNA in the ultracentrifuged plasma. This patient, male, and diagnosed with HCV genotype 1b, had received INF-PEG monotherapy prior to KT.

During a mean follow-up time of 26.61 ± 6.03 months after antiviral treatment of the patients treated with DAA, we observed a significant increase in protein / creatinine ratio (P = 0.001), although there was no impact on the renal function of the graft. Liver function improved significantly as a decrease in AST and ALT (P = 0.006 and P = 0.011), respectively. The worst evolution of the renal graft of the serie was in the recipient with detectable HCV RNA in the ultracentrifuged plasma, due to infection by polyoma virus after a humoral rejection. Liver function despite having SVR, only persisted altered in this patient.

Conclusions: Although a small series of patients are treated and more studies are required, treatment with DAA is effective for complete eradication of the virus unlike conventional treatments with INF, in which HCV can persist being undetectable with conventional techniques. This persistence seems to affect post-KT evolution.


Between 1.8 and 8% of patients receiving Kidney Transplantation (KT) are infected with the Hepatitis C virus (HCV) [1]. Despite the higher risk of complications compared to KT recipients without classical HCV, their survival is greater when compared to that of patients on hemodialysis [2]. Conventional antiviral therapies did not eliminate HCV efficiently and safely. Interferon-α, ribavirin and therapies based on protease inhibitors were the best options [3]. However, interferon α is associated with poor sustained viral response (SVR) (negative viral load after 12 weeks of antiviral treatment termination) (13-43%) and is contraindicated in the post-KT due to the high prevalence of adverse effects (rejection of the renal graft) [4]. Monotherapy with ribavirin was not effective and compared to protease inhibitors, its use was limited in post-KT due to interactions with calcineurin inhibitors and severe adverse effects [5].

The direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have recently been considered safe for the treatment of HCV in post-TR [6-9]. KT recipients who received at least two different classes of DAA achieved SVR at 12 weeks by 90% [10]. A recent review evaluated the efficacy and safety of treatment with DAA in KT recipients with chronic HCV infection: 98.3% of the patients had a SVR, and liver function improved significantly and, nevertheless, there was no deterioration in renal function [11].

It has been proven in patients with HCV and without renal disease that HCV RNA can remain in the liver and in PBMC after SVR has been obtained both by conventional treatments and by treatment with DAA [12-15]. It has also been shown that the presence of HCV RNA after ultracentrifugation of serum samples in patients with SVR can predict the reactivation of HCV [14]. As KT recipients are immunologically compromised, we wanted to assess the efficacy of conventional antiviral treatments and DAA in those with SVR, testing for HCV RNA in PBMC and in the pellets obtained by ultracentrifugation of plasma samples (the combination of these assays allows the identification of more than 80% of patients with a confirmed occult HCV infection in their liver [15]), as well as to review the safety of the hepatic and renal repercussions of antiviral treatment.

Material and methods

We analyzed 18 renal transplant recipients, older than 18 years, whose HCV infection had been treated with antivirals and had SVR, who came to our Nephrology Department for follow-up. An informed consent was obtained and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee for clinical research. Patients who did not reach SVR or had a reactivation of viremia at the time of the study were excluded. HCV treatment of the 18 recipients of KT is shown in figure 1.

Different parameters were collected in relation to the cause of renal failure, the type of dialysis received, the number of previous transplants, the HCV genotype and the antiviral treatments received, as well as the time of antiviral treatment (dialysis or with functioning KT), whose data are shown in table 1.

In those KT recipients treated post-KT, hepatic and renal function were analyzed before and after treatment with DAA, as well as the number of renal graft rejections, interactions and complications of antiviral treatment.


Plasma and PBMCs were isolated from anticoagulated blood by density gradient centrifugation (Biocoll, Biochrom, Berlin, Germany). Plasma samples were stored at -30ºC and the PBMCs at -30°C in RNAlater solution (Ambion, Austin, TX) until detection of HCV-RNA.

Two milliliters of plasma were ultracentrifuged over a 10% sucrose cushion for 17 h at 100,000 x g and 4°C to concentrate HCV particles [16]. The pellet was dissolved in 250 µl of TE buffer (Tris-HCl 10 mM, EDTA 10 mM; pH 7.5) and RNA was isolated with the Trizol LS Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). After precipitation, the RNA pellet was dissolved in 10 µl of nucleases-free water. Total RNA was isolated from PBMCs using the SV Total RNA Isolation System (Promega, Madison, WI). After isopropanol precipitation, RNA pellet was dissolved in 10 of µl nucleases-free water and its concentration was measured by spectrophotometry.

Detection of the 5 ‘non-coding region of HCV-RNA was performed by real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR with fluorescence resonance energy transfer probes. Two microliters of total RNA isolated from 2 mL of ultracentrifuged plasma, or 0.5 µg of total RNA from PBMCs was retrotranscribed and amplified in a singletube reaction containing RNA reaction mix (LightCycler Master Hybprobe, Roche, and Mannheim, Germany). Primers, probes and conditions of this RT-PCR reaction have been previously reported [17]. For avoiding contaminations, the guidelines of Kwok and Higuchi [18], were strictly observed and negative controls and blanks were coprepared with the samples and accompanied them through the entire PCR process. As positive controls, HCV RNA–positive plasma and PBMCs from patients with chronic HCV infection were used.


The categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. The continuous variables were calculated using Student’s t-test for paired data, and significance using the U-tests of Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon. All this using the SPSS program version 20.0


The characteristics of the KT patients, treated with DAA, and the treatments used are listed in table 2. The most used regimen was sofosbuvir / ledipasvir and the initial FG in all the recipients were > 30 ml / min. There were no adverse effects during antiviral treatment that required hospitalization or discontinuation of therapy. All patients treated post-KT received the therapy after 6 months post KT, with stable renal function and levels of calcineurin inhibitors and low doses of steroids (in the case of being with these treatments).

In none of the 14 recipients of KT treated with DAA, the presence of HCV RNA was detected neither in PBMC nor in plasma after ultracentrifugation. Viral RNA was also not detected in the PBMCs of the 4 patients with SVR after treatment with IFN (monotherapy or with RBV). However, one of them was positive to HCV RNA in the pellet obtained by plasma ultracentrifugation. This patient, male, and diagnosed with HCV genotype 1b, had received INF-PEG monotherapy prior to KT, and during the subsequent follow-up of 103 months the presence of HCV-RNA in serum was not detected by conventional technique. Graft and patient survival were 100% at the end of follow-up.

In the 14 patients treated with DAA, liver function improved significantly when comparing basal and post-treatment levels of AST and ALT (P = 0.006 and P = 0.011, respectively.

Of the patients included in the study, 17 had previously received dialysis (hemodialysis in 55.6%, peritoneal dialysis in 11.1% and both in 27.8%), and the remaining patient was transplanted from a pre-dialysis live donor. 10 patients (55.6%) had their first KT, 7 the second (38.9%) and 1 patient had received his third KT (5.6%). Regarding antiviral treatment, 9 patients were previously treated with KT; 1 with DAA (in which no relapse is targeted), 7 with INF-α, and in one case, with INF- and RBV. Of these, 3 had SVR, another 3 suffered a reactivation after finishing the treatment and 2 did not respond, with the efficacy of pre-KT treatment with conventional antivirals of 50%. The 5 patients who did not respond to pre-KT or relapsed pre-KT were treated post-KT with DAA and another 8 who had not received pre-KT treatment. In total 14 patients were treated with DAA (13 post KT and one pre KT). All patients completed the treatment with DAA and were followed for a minimum of 12 months after antiviral treatment with a mean follow-up time of 26.61 ± 6.03 months.

No significant differences were observed in the renal function of the graft before and after treatment with DAA (in the 13 patients treated after KT). The protein / creatinine index increased significantly after treatment, but was not associated with ledipasvir / sofosbuvir treatment, the genotype, or the underlying type of kidney disease, significantly. The results on liver and kidney function can be found in table 3.

Regarding the evolution of the patient with occult HCV, a nephropathy due to the polyoma virus after the diagnosis and treatment of a humoral rejection, was diagnosed. The kidney function of this patient’s graft had not been considered for renal evaluation since it was previously treated with KT with INF-PEG. Its renal function and the evolution of the renal graft was the worst in the serie, despite the fact that he had a follow-up time of 103 months, which was lower than the mean of the serie. Finally, his liver function did not improve significantly, unlike the rest of the patients.


The main finding in this study is the safety of knowing that occult HCV infection is negative in patients treated with DAA, even if they are kidney transplants and, therefore, immunosuppressed.

Only in a male diagnosed with HCV genotype 1b, treated prior to KT with INF-PEG monotherapy, HCV RNA was detected in the ultracentrifuged plasma. In the 14 KT receptors treated with DAA, HCV RNA was not detected in any case in PBMC or in plasma after ultracentrifugation.


All patients treated with DAA (1 pre-KT and 13 post-KT) completed the prescribed treatment. 100% of the patients treated with DAA had a SVR, and in no case was HCV RNA detected by RT-PCR in PBMC or in plasma after ultracentrifugation, during a follow-up period of 26.61 ± 6.04 months.

Safety and tolerance of AAD treatment

Liver function improved significantly after treatment with DAA, measured by the detection of AST and ALT, where both decreased after treatment. No significant differences were observed in renal function of the graft before and after treatment with DAA. These findings have also been found in a recent review [11]. However, a worsening of the protein / creatinine index was observed shortly after the therapy, in 4 patients who had received post-KT DAA, (28.5%). The survival of the graft and the patient was 100%, so our data are very similar to those of Lubetzky et al (20). In this series, 31 patients were analyzed, treated with new DAA, post-KT of which 6 presented a worsening of proteinuria (19.3%) and in which there was a tendency to be treated with ledipasvir / sofosbuvir, in comparison with the control group (0.36 ± 0.72 g / g, P = 0.06). Of the 6 patients, in two cases they showed a worsening of renal function [16].

In our series in only one patient, baseline proteinuria was positive and at the end of follow-up in 4 patients it was positive, unlike the work of Lubetzky et al., [19,20], in which no patient developed de novo proteinuria. Among these patients, 1 patient was treated with sirolimus for a lymphoma, and another had been diagnosed with a monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance in the past and had a severe von Willebrand disease, so that a renal biopsy could not be performed to rule out monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance. Neither a renal biopsy was performed in another recipient with new onset proteinuria in a patient with mental retardation, who became intermittent with antiproteinuric drugs. All patients with a positive protein / creatinine index were receiving antiproteinurics and a patient had been biopsied and diagnosed with humoral rejection after receiving antiviral treatment with DAA. In our small series, the increase in protein / creatinine index was not associated with the treatment with ledipasvir / sofosbuvir, the HCV genotype or the type of renal disease, in a significant way. Other studies have also described the appearance of proteinuria in patients treated with DAAs, which include 5 patients with focal and segmental glomerulonephritis development and another case with development of glomerulonephritis mediated by lupus-like immune complexes [19-23].

Podocyte direct damage, immune reconstitution and interaction with concomitant immunosuppressive medication have been suggested as hypotheses [20].

We therefore recommend monitoring urine analysis before, during and after treatment with antiviral drugs, and if proteinuria develops, refer the patient to the nephrologist. Although proteinuria is a marker of kidney damage, its small amount may not represent as much damage.

Regarding our patient with occult HCV infection the persistence of alteration in transaminases reinforces the hypothesis of silent liver damage, since this did not occur in the rest of the patients in the series. However, he did not suffer reactivation of his hepatitis C and neither does this seem to directly affect his post-KT evolution during the observation time.

The detection of the virus by this technique is still a marker of the evolution of the patient and there is a need for more research data that could guide the need or not to receive additional treatments.

In conclusion, although a small series of patients is treated, and more studies are required, treatment with DAA is effective with complete eradication of the virus, unlike conventional treatments, with INF, in which HCV can persist, being undetectable with conventional techniques and this persistence seems to affect post-KT evolution.

  1. Scott DR, Wong JK, Spicer TS, Dent H, Mensah FK (2010) Adverse impact of hepatitis c virus infection in renal replacemente therapy and renal transplantation in patients in Australia and New Zealand. Transplantation 90: 1165-1171. Link:
  2. Ingsathit A, Kamanamool N, Thakkinstian A, Sumethkul V (2013) Survival advantage of kidney transplantation over dialysis in patients with hepatitis C: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transplantation 95: 943-948. Link:
  3. Fabrizi F, Dixit V, Martin P, G. LUNGHI (2006) Meta -analysis: anti-viral therapy of hepatitis C virus-related liver disease in renal transplant patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 24: 1413-1422. Link:
  4. Berenguer M (2008) Systematic review of the treatment of established recurrent hepatitis C with pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin. J Hepatol 49: 274-287. Link:
  5. Nair SP (2013) Protease inhibitor therapy post-liver transplantation in the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection. Gastroenterol Hepatol 9: 388-390. Link:
  6. Sulkowski MS, Gardiner DF, Rodriguez-Torres M, K. Rajender Reddy, Tarek Hassanein (2014) Daclastavir plus sofosbuvir for previously treated or untreated chronic HCV infection. N Engl J Med 370: 211-221. Link:
  7. Lawitz E, Sulkowski MS, Ghalib R, Rodriguez-Torres M, Younossi ZM, et al. (2014) Simeprevir plus sofosbuvir with or without ribavirin, to treat chronic infection with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 in non-responder to pegylated interferon and ribavirin and treatment naive patients: the COSMOS randomised study. Lancet 384: 1756-1765. Link:
  8. Afdhal N, Redd y KR, Nelson DR, Lawitz E, Gordon SC, et al. (2014) Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for previously treated HCV genotype 1 infection. N Engl J Med 370: 1879-1893. Link:
  9. Afdhal N, Zeuzem S, Kwo P, Paul Kwo, Mario Chojkier, et al.(2014) Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for untreated HCV genotype 1 infection. N Engl J Med 370: 1483-1493. Link:
  10. Lawitz E, Mangia A, Wyles D, Rodriguez-Torres M, Hassanein T (2013) Sofosbuvir for previously untreated choronic hepatitis C infection. N Engl J Med 368: 1878-1887. Link:
  11. Keliang Chen BD, Pei Lu, Reijin Song, Zhang J, Tao R (2017) Direct- acting antiviral agent efficacy and safety in renal transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Medicine 96: 30. Link:
  12. Radkowski M, Gallegos-Orozco JF, Jablonska J, Jablonska J, Colby TV, et al. (2005) Persistence of hepatitis C virus in patients successfully treated for chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 41: 106–114. Link:
  13. Castillo I, Rodrıíguez-Iñigo E, López-Alcorocho JM, Pardo M, Bartolomé J, et al. (2006) Hepatitis C virus replicates in the liver of sustained responder patients to antiviral treatment. Clin Infect Dis 43: 1277–1283. Link:
  14. Castillo I, Bartolomé J, Quiroga JA, G. BARRIL, V. CARREÑO (2009) Presence of HCV -RNA after ultracentrifugation of serum samples during the follow-up of chronic hepatitis C patients with a sustained virological response may predict reactivation of hepatitis C virus infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 30: 477-486. Link:
  15. Castillo I, Bartolome J, Quiroga JA, Barril G, Carreño V (2010) Diagnosis of occult hepatitis C virus without the need of or liver biopsy J Med Virol 82: 1554-1559. Link:
  16. Elmasry S, Wadhwa S, Bang BR, Linda Cook, Shefali Chopra (2017) Detection of occult hepatitis C virus infection in patients who achieved a sustained virologic response to direct-acting antiviral agents for recurrent iinfection after liver transplantation. Gastroenterology 152: 550-553. Link:
  17. Bartolome J, López-Alcorocho, Castillo I, Elena Rodríguez-Iñigo, Juan Antonio Quiroga (2007) Ultracentrifugation of serum samples allows detection of hepatitis c virus RNA in patients with hepatitis C virus. J Virol 81: 7710-7715. Link:
  18. Quiroga JA, Avellón A, Bartolomé J, María Andréu, Elena Flores (2016) Detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) core–specific antibody suggests occult HCV infection among blood donors. Transfusion 56: 1883-1890. Link:
  19. Kwok S, Higuchi R (1989) Avoiding false positive with PCR. Nature 339: 237-238. Link:
  20. Lubetzky M, Chun S, Joelson A, Coco M, Kamal L (2017) Safety and efficacy of treatment of hepatitis C in kidney transplant recipients with direct acting antiviral agents. Transplantation 101: 1704-1710. Link:
  21. Hogan JJ, Lim MA, Palmer MB, Bloom RD, Chung RT (2017) Development of Proteinuria and Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis During Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy for Hepatitis C Virus Infection. Hepatology 16: 658-660. Link:
  22. Lin MV, Sise ME, Pavlakis M, Amundsen BM, Chute D (2016) Efficacy and safety of direct acting antivirals in kidney transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. PLoS One 11: e0158431. Link:
  23. Sise ME, Wisocky J, Rosales IA, Donald Chute, Jacinta A. Holmes (2016) Lupus-like immune complex-mediated glomerulonephritis in patients with hepatitis C virus infection treated with oral, interferon-free, direct-acting antiviral therapy. Kidney Int Rep 1: 135-143. Link:
© 2019 Olea T, et al. This is an open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Help ?